Clerk’s committee has compiled the following list of parameters to consider in evaluating positions. These would apply both to tenure-track and non-tenure-track hiring. We have compiled these from our past practices and from comparison with those used at other schools.
What we’d like from you is:
- Tell us whether the items on this list are appropriate. Are we missing anything we could consider? Is there something here which should not be here? Can you suggest different language or a different focus for a priority we have listed?
- Tell us which of these parameters should be prioritized, and which should be given less weight or eliminated.
Here are the parameters we’ve come up with, listed in no particular order:
a) Existing or future staffing patterns, including a list and count of current faculty, history of class sizes, and ratios like student credit hours per faculty member and majors per faculty member
b) Current extent of reliance on adjuncts and visiting faculty to cover the program’s curriculum
c) Enrollment trends over time, including number of majors and graduates
d) Departmental curricular needs (including general education courses provided by the department)
e) Consideration of the College Mission Statement and planning documents.
f) Personnel planning related to future retirements or possible departures of current faculty
g) Promotion of new programs approved by faculty
h) Recent departures or loss of program participants
Note: There will be no request for proposals for tenure-track hiring this year. Jane has decided that while we are in budget deficit, we cannot add people to potentially permanent positions. If your program has a need for additional teaching, please contact Beth about adding temporary positions to cover your needs.
UPDATE: We thought that last year’s solicitation for proposals for tenure-track faculty hires might be of interest. It is here: Position Request Memo